copyrighted

“That which is hateful to you do not do to another.. the rest (of the Torah) is all commentary now go study.â€�- Rabbi Hillel“If I am not for myself then who will be for me? And if I am only for myself then what am I? And if not now when?â€� - Rabbi Hillel The views and/or opinions posted on all the blog posts and in the comment sections are of the respective authors not necessarily those of Dandelion Salad. “Audio Panton. Cogito Singularis. Listen to everything think for yourself.â€� Feel free to repost on a non-commercial blog/website but be polite and include an active link back to the particular blog post please. Bill Moyers talks with Manuel A. Vásquez (video link; immigration) November 17. 2007 — dandelionsalad A different take on immigration from author Manuel Vásquez. “This whole concept of illegality…is really problematic. Because it really doesn’t go to the complexities of the situation,” he says. Manuel Vásquez born in El Salvador is an associate professor of sociology and religion at the University of Florida in Gainesville specializing in the ways in which Latino immigration affects American communities. In his studies. Vásquez has focused upon a growing sense of transnationalism among immigrant populations. “Today’s immigrants are able to have dual loyalties,” he explains to Bill Moyers. “That it’s not one or the other but that one can have roots in the country of settlement but also one can still have ties with your home country.” FAIR USE NOTICE: This blog may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes to advance understanding of human rights democracy scientific moral ethical and social justice issues etc. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U. S. C section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107 the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’ you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> Dandelion Salad Posts News Politics and-or Videos (377)

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://dandelionsalad.wordpress.com/2007/11/17/bill-moyers-talks-with-manuel-a-vasquez-video-link-immigration/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

“That which is hateful to you do not do to another.. the rest (of the Torah) is all commentary now go study.â€�- Rabbi Hillel“If I am not for myself then who will be for me? And if I am only for myself then what am I? And if not now when?â€� - Rabbi Hillel The views and/or opinions posted on all the blog posts and in the comment sections are of the respective authors not necessarily those of Dandelion Salad. “Audio Panton. Cogito Singularis. Listen to everything think for yourself.â€� Feel free to repost on a non-commercial blog/website but be polite and include an active link back to the particular blog post please. Bill Moyers talks with Manuel A. Vásquez (video link; immigration) November 17. 2007 — dandelionsalad A different take on immigration from author Manuel Vásquez. “This whole concept of illegality…is really problematic. Because it really doesn’t go to the complexities of the situation,” he says. Manuel Vásquez born in El Salvador is an associate professor of sociology and religion at the University of Florida in Gainesville specializing in the ways in which Latino immigration affects American communities. In his studies. Vásquez has focused upon a growing sense of transnationalism among immigrant populations. “Today’s immigrants are able to have dual loyalties,” he explains to Bill Moyers. “That it’s not one or the other but that one can have roots in the country of settlement but also one can still have ties with your home country.” FAIR USE NOTICE: This blog may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes to advance understanding of human rights democracy scientific moral ethical and social justice issues etc. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U. S. C section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107 the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’ you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> Dandelion Salad Posts News Politics and-or Videos (377)

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://dandelionsalad.wordpress.com/2007/11/17/bill-moyers-talks-with-manuel-a-vasquez-video-link-immigration/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Once in a while the subject of copyright in photography comes forward. It is an area where understandably there is much misconception mainly because there is not a “universalâ€� law on copyrights in photography. Actually different countries have different laws and even inside the same country like the US... or to join in the conversation on Digg. You'll also be able to Digg stories to help promote things you like. Digg is coming to a city (and computer) near you! Check out all the details on our and & . Townhall Webcast - November 6th at 5pm PSTLondon - Oct 10More Dates TBA © Digg Inc. 2008 —Content posted byDigg usersis. DIGG. DIGG IT. DUGG. DIGG THIS. Digg graphics logos designs page headers button icons scripts and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://digg.com/design/Photographing_Copyrighted_Work_Can_you_or_not

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

I just looked at my site today to see what was going on and I got a message saying "This Account Has Been Suspended". I called and they said they dropped me as a customer for having copyrighted material like some BBC stuff. communicate. TV and my own podcast. It was Host Monster that was my host. Any good hosts out there that don't compassionate if I do? Get a real-time look beneath the surface in the with our tools and. Also see our original real-time tracking system. --> DIGG. DIGG IT. DUGG. DIGG THIS. Digg graphics logos designs summon headers add icons scripts and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://digg.com/security/I_got_shutdown_for_copyrighted_material_it_may_be

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

is a new service that allows you to upload any audio file clip out a part of that register for a cell phone go tone and overlap that with other users. The company’s early investors include Tim Draper. There are two things that are notable about the service; the first is that unlike some other lightweight services like this PhoneZoo actually works the second is how the company handles use of copyrighted music. PhoneZoo scores high on ease of use users set the duration of the tone and drag a marker over the segment of an audio register they want to choose. Metadata for sharing can be provided procure status of the file is asked and with one click a link to download the go tone is sent to your phone. On the copyright question. PhoneZoo lists two types of ring tones available for sharing. Public domain files can be downloaded by anyone. Ringtones from copyrighted music can be listened to discussed searched for - but not downloaded until you upload a copy of the whole song yourself. It’s an interesting way to get around having PhoneZoo held responsible for copyright violations. When you upload a copyrighted song the ring tone creation tool opens with the same tone duration title fields and excerpted section of your file as the ring mouth you wanted to acquire from some one else. You can then make any changes you want for example you might like the divide of a song someone has excerpted but be to increase it by 2 seconds to capture another bring together of beats. I can imagine populate enjoying that. It’s all opt-in of course there’s nothing enforcing any kind of procure protection - no rights detection software apparently for example. It’s an intriguing system. Best of all it’s relatively simple and it works. The social element may or may not prove compelling. The company is working on a widget that would let you show your most recent or favorite ring tones on a social networking site. That could appeal to many populate. PhoneZoo received a variety of coverage when it launched yesterday. Oliver at says there are many questions about the function’s viability that remain unanswered. Emily Turrettini at thinks PhoneZoo is “fabulous.” Carlo at says PhoneZoo is headed for an uphill contend in the legal department. Time ordain tell whether ring tone sharing is something people want and whether the song upload requirement on copyrighted works will hold water. This is another attempt to rip off artists. There are legitimate.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/11/16/phonezoo-make-and-share-free-ringtones/#comment-1759568

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

After learning of this court decision. Shay Taylor a high educate video production teacher from Montgomery County. Maryland expressed her fear explaining. “I’ve got a lay aside of videotapes with copyrighted excerpts of TV shows movies advertising news and music videos that I use all the time in my teaching. I wonder if they’re going to come after me some day.� At a time when online digital technologies are enabling users to act and overlap an ever-widening array of multimedia texts there is an increasing climate of fear among educators about the use of new resources for teaching and learning. The changing legal environment and high levels of copyright confusion surrounding digital media affect educators and their students in a variety of school university and non-profit settings. In K-12 higher education and afterschool programs and workshops educators face conflicting information about their rights and their students’ rights to use copyrighted material. They also confront complex restrictive copyright policies in their own institutions and organizations. Although copyright law permits a wide be of uses of copyrighted material without permission or payment educators today undergo no shared understanding of what constitutes acceptable fair use learn. On September 25. 2007. Renee Hobbs of Temple University’s Media Education Lab. Pat Aufderheide of the bear on for Social Media at American University and Peter Jaszi of the Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property in the American University Washington College of Law released a report funded by the John D and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. More than 60 educators youth media professionals librarians and college faculty were interviewed about their understanding of copyright and bring together use as these concepts bear on to their work. This investigate revealed that in order to broach with copyright restrictions teachers may choose one of several coping strategies: they may avoid sharing lesson plans curriculum materials or student productions; they may “hyper-comply,� by creating unnecessary copyright restrictions for students as a prove of ignorance or fear; or they may blatantly ignore copyright all together close the doors of their classroom and do whatever they desire. As Renee Hobbs pointed out. “Some of the fundamental goals of media literacy education—to cultivate critical thinking about media and its role in grow and society in request to alter creative communication skills—are compromised by lack of understanding about procure law.� In the current phase of the project. Hobbs and her colleagues are attempting to create a shared understanding of fair use among media literacy and youth media educators by hosting small-group consensus-building meetings in cities across the country. So far meetings have been held in Boston. New York and San Francisco. The meetings brought together diverse groups of youth media educators university faculty and K-12 teachers. The discussions were led by Peter Jaszi of the Washington College of Law at American University who is one of the country's leading legal experts on copyright and fair use. bring together use is the most important (and most misunderstood) tool in procure law for educators and many youth media educators and K-12 teachers are unfamiliar with the concept. It is intended to fit the rights of owners with the rights of users by encouraging the widespread use of cultural products. While most educators see copyright as primarily protecting the property rights of creative producers in fact the concept of fair use shows that users are entitled to acquire quote or make use of the creative bring home the bacon of others in developing their own ideas with proper citation. Unfortunately educators often receive conservative copyright advice from lawyers who wish to minimize the potential for lawsuits. For example one youth media curriculum developer at a study nonprofit organization described her experience of developing curriculum materials: “When we actually published the curriculum our attorney said we could not give populate with material or suggest how they acquire it—we could not say ‘photocopy’ or ‘tape.’ I got around this by just saying ‘obtain.’ These restrictions made it difficult for us to be creative.� Limitations like this constrain the development of media literacy programs nationwide. In each city key themes emerged from meetings with media educators. In New York educators questioned bring together use and digital sharing. In Boston the focus was more about getting copyright permission and in San Francisco educators were curious how to balance the rights of owners and users. It is no surprise that life in a digital world changes the way creative bring home the bacon is circulated. It is easier than ever for educators to copy and give the intellectual property of others and in a meeting held at the Academy for Educational Development in New York City this go educators discussed “what’s fair� about such sharing. Participants discussed various hypothetical situations that elucidated points of consensus and disagreement among educators. A discussion based on photocopying copyrighted materials immediately shifted to a conversation about scanning digitizing and electronically distributing documents. There was confusion among educators regarding the acceptable scale of distribution regarding the educational use of copyrighted works. Several participants noted that various gatekeepers at their institutions prevented them from making copies—usually based on an arbitrary guideline or rule with no legal standing. Many agreed with one university administrator who remarked that when it comes to using copyrighted materials for educational purposes it is a “Don’t ask don’t tell� culture. grapple with how to hold their own economic interests in a digital world youth media educators who believe on timely and current information find they cannot drop to wait for industries to finalize their business models. One youth media curriculum developer in New York City warned that media educators be to be careful about balancing creators’ interests with their own: “As educators where do we displace the lie? I don’t be to stifle media producers from producing.� Music and popular grow are fix artifacts of the cultural environment and more and more students want to be able to use appropriation and remix techniques in creating their own work. However there is great confusion over the role of music in youth media productions. “It’s a mash up world,� said one youth media educator. “but we are afraid of letting students get away with this especially if they want their work seen in screenings and festivals.� The fear surrounding the appropriation of popular music was disproportionately higher than fear concerning the use of video photocopies or other forms of media— perhaps because the music industry has been aggressive in taking legal actions against unauthorized sampling and downloading. When should media literacy and youth media educators get permission to ingeminate from or use the copyrighted works of others? When is permission unnecessary? In a meeting at Wheelock College in Boston hosted by Professor Petra Hesse this issue was hotly debated. Participants argued over when it was allot to ask a copyright holder for permission to use his or her bring home the bacon. Most youth media and media literacy educators agreed.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.youthmediareporter.org/2007/11/using_media_fair_use_and_copyr.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

<strong>1</strong> <a href="/album/561470304QKtQCo?start=28">2</a> <a href="/album/561470304QKtQCo?start=28" rel="next" class="next">next</a> Pre columbian civilisations jewels in Peru museums - Allowed use only for publication on website www webshots com. You can download them for personal use only - Incomplet album. bring home the bacon in progress Fascinating album Monica - will you also consider captions on the photos? Not easy to photograph through glass as I undergo tried and the reflection spoils the shot. change regards. Joy Wonderfully strange!!!! Those golden sandals must undergo been quite uncomfortable to wear if worn at all. Thanks for the peek at an ancient and wonderful civilization. Ron Ciao Monica un album molto bello e particolare unico del suo genere. Brava! Un caro saluto. Renato. Facinating album of artifacts come up photographed. I did tour one museum in Lima December 2000 & we did go in the gold room there. I do not remember many of these items (I do have some 35mm photos somewhere). I be to remember there was another museum we did not have measure to visit. Amazing the grow they had there so far back in measure. Many thanks for letting me know about my Penguin photo on the South America page. I might undergo missed it as I do not go there very often. Eric questo è un museo che visiterei volentieri! Almeno l'ho potuto ammirare attraverso i tuoi occhi. I miei si sono incantati di fronte a quegli orecchini... che belli! Chissà quante meraviglie hanno fuso quei cretini di spagnoli! ah non ti ho detto che l'album mi ha affascinato ma lo avevi capito... - Paola Those are some beauties. I bet their real expensive. I'm surprised they let you phtograph them <a categorise="tag" href="http://community webshots com/user/dcrrld/tags/%s/albums">%s</a> Tags are labels or keywords used to classify and assort pictures videos,albums and change surface populate.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://travel.webshots.com/album/561470304QKtQCo

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Millersburg. Ohio — The RIAA announced today that it is stepping up its race against procure infringement and will now aim persons who go or hum non-public domain songs without paying royalties. Get a real-time look beneath the ascend in the with our tools and. Also see our original real-time tracking system. NEW! analyse out where you can Digg and watch the activity of your favorite Presidential candidates. --> DIGG. DIGG IT. DUGG. DIGG THIS. Digg graphics logos designs page headers add icons scripts and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://digg.com/music/RIAA_Sues_Amish_Man_for_Illegal_Whistling_of_Copyrighted_Material

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

But as circumscribe media expert rightly asks strong business interests behind the provision of such copyright-infringing-detection technologies may further muddle the waters in this already difficult to manage scenario. While the natural drive of the emerging web culture and its vastly popular social media services breathes on open sharing of large numbers of copyrighted materials the industries that produce those same contents seem yet unable to paint a new vision of their circumscribe distribution and delivery strategy that encompasses instead of outlawing the free and spontaneous extended distribution of their contents online. Far from moving any closer to leveraging the new economy natural forces procure holders are simultaneously as far as one could create by mental act from being able to accept on a common set of principles rules or policies and specific tools to deploy their wishful universal identification filtering and referencing system of all online copyrighted materials. Instead explore's YouTube initiative which was eagerly awaited only a few months ago constitutes in the minds of many media companies only a partial and proprietary solution to the question of how to manage copyrighted materials in social media outlets. No matter how accurate the tools get it is important to bequeath that no technology can tell legal from infringing material without the cooperation of the circumscribe owners themselves. This means that procure holders who want to use and back up us refine our Video ID system ordain be providing the necessary information to help us accept their bring home the bacon. We aim to make that process as convenient as possible. Several media and technology companies undergo joined together to define "," an online document that provides a general framework of requirements for managing copyrighted materials in social media services. Although not a binding legal document the language of is clearly legally oriented with the typical onerous one-sided expectations that any corporate legal team is likely to insert in terms of unconditional legal yield. Moreover if one tries to abide by this framework a social media service provider must believe the following claim in the UGCP: Copyright Owners should not insist that adherence to these Principles including efforts by UGC Services to locate or shift infringing content as provided by these Principles or to replace content following receipt of an effective counter notification as provided in the give disqualification from any limitation on direct or indirect liability relating to material online under the Copyright Act or substantively similar statutes of any applicable jurisdiction outside the United States. In other words change surface if you do everything that we ask you to don't expect that procure holders still won't give you a hard measure. There's comfort for you. The main rub in the is that while it is broad enough to provide a general requirements framework to develop more universal copyright management services it does nothing to ensure that copyright holders ordain provide any significant standardization of copyright identification technology filtering processes and reference materials referenced in the document. In essence it suggests to social media sites that they must be ready to institute whatever technologies that any be of publishers find to be acceptable to their needs. Given that Microsoft is one of the technology companies that has signed on to the UGCP one can create by mental act that there may be some proprietary interests in play on this front. does cite some good beat practices for managing copyrighted content in a social media environment but it's far from clear that it brings the content industry any closer to a significant agreement on how procure should be managed in online materials. for rushing to get some choose of filtering and identification system in place on a rapid basis we are no closer to procure holders agreeing to a common framework for them taking on some reasonable portion of the burden of implementing tools that ordain make the universal identification filtering and referencing of copyrighted materials simple and reasonable to bring home the bacon. To some degree the go of and identification schemes that eliminate onerous packaging are pointing towards a more workable solution. Being able to allow publishers to identify their content using reports from social media sites and their own scanning tools can help them to determine when the reuse of copyrighted materials is worth pursuing as a legal matter or as a business development opportunity. But until these technologies are implemented more broadly it's unrealistic to expect social media outlets to act aggressively with their own solutions if they see Google getting slammed by UGCP members for its efforts. We seem to be creeping towards change state solutions that will alter publishers to get around the copyright conundrum without huge proprietary investments but don't evaluate the pace to pick up until some publishers undergo proven how to do it cheap simply and in a way that won't be irksome to the creative talents that are driving online content value. Just released. Unique. Alternative. Hard-to-find,Cost-effective tools and technology to appoint you to communicate,collaborate and learn more and betterIndependent non-US-centric analysis and review of new mediatechnologies and access to information from a user-centered viewpointVista Points:Online Collaboration and ExchangeE-Learning. Interactive Learning Technologies. EdTechSearch and ResearchInterface Design and NavigationDigital Imaging and Data VisualizationTesting and SupportTranslation and InternationalizationPrivacy and SecurityInformation AccesseMarketing

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.masternewmedia.org/intellectual_property/copyrighted-content/how-to-manage-copyrighted-content-on-social-media-outlets-20071026.htm

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

I undergo been having problems with this for some measure now. I am not sure what the air is. I can't assign anything to another Tivo or destroy shows recorded with my Humax to a DVD. I get a clump of circles with lines through it next to the shows. I posted about this a while back. Someone suggested I may have a bad cable box. Finally got the cable affiliate out. He said that all digital programing is procure protected and that I won't be able to destroy or assign it. Can this possibly be true? He wouldn't furnish me a new telecommunicate box either..... Anyone else burning shows with Brighthouse? This seems ridiculous. I undergo Brighthouse of Central Florida. 3 of 43 recordings are copy protected and all of them are movies - one of which was recorded from Movies On bespeak. No problems with PC transfers or DVD burns with the others. From what I have read in the forums the copy protection sign is sent from the cable provider and not supplied through the guide data. I remember seeing issues where people have contacted their telecommunicate provider to correct the flags with some success. (C) 2007 - All Rights Reserved. No information may be posted elsewhere without written permission. TiVo® is a registered trademark of TiVo Inc. This site is not owned or operated by TiVo Inc.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.tivocommunity.com/tivo-vb/showthread.php?t=365532&goto=newpost

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Look for paper towels , linens, bath towels, and more at TowelTown.com
stop by anytime

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

What happens when a non-lawyer faces off with six corporate lawyers. Air Force lawyers corporations and politicians? Thanks for tuning in to find out. Hopefully she won't change state cheat bait. Anti-SLAPP or the "Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation," law protects citizens from suits filed to conquer speech about matters of "public interest or concern." The express's General Assembly passed the law in 1996. O. C. G. A. § 9-11-11.1. And this that you acknowledge this site is not to be used as legal advice and the posts by lawyers and others are not an attorney-client relationship. There are errors in litigation processes documented in this place. Please ask with a lawyer if you be legal advice. As you know. I had a deposition yesterday.  Oh by the way… I did great!  I didn’t ask for any breaks.  It was them who called all the breaks.  [proud of herself] I’m sure every pro se litigant knows by now lawyers are going to ask for EVERYTHING under the sun.  But I challenge some of the things being asked for so I’m asking my readers what you think. 1. They be copies of all the pleadings from my previous lawsuit:  My argument is they can get those through the act.  What I have are copies and not certified.  If they have access to the same files I undergo access to (through Pacer or walking into the act) then asking me to reproduce hundreds of documents is unfair.  Do you accept? 2. They want copies of depositions:  My argument is act reporters alter their living doing depositions.  If I copy the depositions and give them to the lawyers aren’t I violating a procure law and depriving the court reporter of making a living?  This will rob them of the income they would undergo made if the lawyers just paid the court reporter for copies of the deposition.  So are depositions copyrighted and since I love two-part questions like , am I obligated to make copies of the depositions I’ve paid for? I think the deposition went excellent!  More things on record… I love it. That is an interesting quandry. Do you have to give documents that are publically available? Do you undergo to provide documents that you paid someone else for? Are depositions copyrighted? come up good questions all around. To answer your measure question … or the first … depositions are probably not copyrighted. They are different than a enter which is someone else’s work in terms of how they saw the subject and captured it even if the subject is you … at your wedding. Depositions are the transcript of what someone else has done … you … and while you are paying a fee for that service to get down them I would evaluate that you would retain the ownership of the content of those documents. Though there is an interesting and creative argument to be made that the depositions are copyrighted but I would evaluate that there would undergo to be a copyright logo on the deposition with the name of the transcriber for that to be effective as a stated intent. Law firms have tried to procure pleadings and interogatories in complex litigation cases in an attempt to prevent competitors from plagarizing their bring home the bacon in other cases but this has been a bit of a mixed bag of sucess. Now as far as your requirement to provide those documents to the other side. I would suggest that you say the discovery with the answers of where those things can be found and see if they bother to demand further from you for your copies. In the inspect of the depositions … if they are part of a public preserve that is one thing but since you have the contract with the transcriptionist you would probably undergo to give those. If the other align truly needs those things then they will demand that you produce them with a process ducus teucum (fancy words for “bring the stuff listed herein”). Discovery costs are historically born by the one who has the stuff. This is one of those things that has been argued in complex litigation cases involving large volumes of evidence including the new rules of electronic discovery that requries extensive data turnover. Where the costs are going to be inordinately high causing a hardship on one side or the other it is possible to file a communicate for relief from the judge or to file an objection to an overly burdensome discovery request. Those are treated on a case-by-case basis. In the mean time … I declare being nice to those who are asking for the stuff and gently enjoin them to where it can be open at no cost to you where possible. Hope that they play along. Get nasty if you absolutely have to but know that you face an uphill contend … yet again. Note: I had to edit this where I used “deposition” twice where I meant to say “discovery” … brain fart. I don’t have the assure with the transcriptionist. One of the defendants deposed people. Since they were asking for the.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.facingthesharks.com/2007/shark-attack-are-depositions-copyrighted/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Over at the explore Public Policy Blog the is about the economic value of fair use. bring together use is a provision under copyright law that permits certain uses of copyrighted works without seeking permission from the copyright owner. These uses consider things like the freedom to quote from and comment on copyrighted works. Some people argue that some of Google’s services disrespect copyright law because they go beyond what is permitted by fair use. For example has scanned copies of a huge number of copyrighted books. Copies of the text of the books are stored on Google’s servers and you can search the text via their website. Unless Google has gained permission from publishers (or the works are out of procure) they do not however show the entire contents of the books on their site but rather small ’snippets’ relevant to what you searched for. Whether or not this violates procure law is not clear and I’m not a lawyer so I won’t comment on it but there does seem to be some doubt. Another service at air is. When explore indexes web pages for its search engine it may also hold on a copy on its servers. When you examine for something on Google if you move the ‘cached’ link in the search results you will be presented with the copy of the page that Google has copied to its servers rather than sent to the original website. It is possible for websites to prevent their pages from being cached but the default is to be added to the cache unless you specifically set otherwise which is easy to do. Nevertheless this cache also raises some copyright questions because the ‘fail’ of procure law is that permission to copy must be granted rather than the procure owner having to take explicit steps to prevent copying. Anyway we can leave the definition of bring together use for the lawyers to choose out. Turning to economics on the public policy communicate explore refers to a recent by Capital Trade. Inc prepared for the Computer & Communications Industry Association (of which explore is a member) that estimates the “economic value” of industries that depend on fair use to some extent for their operations. The headline results are that such industries contributed US$2.2 trillion (16%) of be US GDP in 2006 and employed 17 million workers who were paid US$1.2 trillion in wages. Big numbers indeed. Aside from exactly how you define “fair use industries”. I want to evince that it’s important to be very very careful about the interpretation of these numbers. Assuming no mistakes were made these figures do estimate the calculate of economic activity that can be attributed to these industries. However it is possible to say that US GDP would shrink by 16% or that 17 million people would change state unemployed if all fair use were suddenly banned. As far as I can express the chew over does not make such claims which is good but it is easy for people to interpret these figures in an remove way. For example. Google concludes its blog post by saying: This chew over suggests that [bring together use is] also an important move of the U. S economy. Strictly speaking this is not quite true because if fair use were to vanish then in a well-functioning economy like that in the US the resources that are used in the fair use industries ordain be picked up and re-used in other alternative uses. Those 17 million people won’t be sitting around idle (at least not for very desire) as there are plenty of alternative things for them to do. An economic impact analysis such as the Capital change chew over that Google refers to does not act into account the possible economic responses to any kind of policy changes regarding fair use. All it tells us is how much these industries contribute to current economic activity but not how economic activity would dress in their absence. To properly assess the effects of any changes in policy towards fair use we need to use a more sophisticated economic model that takes be of how the resources used in fair use industries would be re-allocated to other industries if fair use were restricted. The key then is the difference in productivity of resources in fair use industries versus their productivity in their next beat alternative use. Since this alternative productivity will be greater than adjust the loss in GDP employment and other measures of economic activity will be far smaller than the measures of economic impact that Google cite. And one other thing … never never never use 3D charts especially not 3D pie charts. Nice affix Aaron. Its really a compel that more attention isn’t given to counterfactual scenarios. There is no point in talking about a cost (or a acquire) unless it is relative to some other state of the world. But its very often more convenient to ignore those economic truths and just go around the communicate. I’ve allowed myself to comment directly on Google’s communicate: I am not sure covering all the industries in the report under.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.26econ.com/?p=46

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Tomorrow’s legal fight may be over Web browser add-ons that let people avoid advertisements. These add-ons are growing in functionality and popularity which has led legal experts surveyed this week by CNET News com to anticipate about when the first lawsuit will be filed. If ad-blockers change state so common that they cut away at publishers’ revenues. “I absolutely would expect to see litigation in this area,” said John Palfrey executive director of Harvard Law School’s Berkman Center for Internet and Society. […]Any lawsuit would likely create two arguments—that copyright infringements are taking displace (through derivative works) and that the Web site’s terms of function agreement is being violated. Can they do that? Well aside from the fact that the courts and legislatures always seem willing to turn over for content providers publishers and media moguls regardless of what customers and users want. The terms-of-service argument is the most straightforward. If a web page says that using the site requires you to not use ad=blocking software if you are they could affirm you were violating ToS — though there’s not much they can do aside from booting you from the place. Right? Many Web sites command any kind of ad-blocking in their terms of service agreements. MySpace com prohibits “covering or obscuring the banner advertisements on your personal compose summon or any MySpace com page via HTML/CSS or any other means.” Six Apart’s LiveJournal uses similar language as do some news organizations including the Chicago Sun-Times and Fox TV’s Houston affiliate. CNET News com does not. But that just comes down to a (blow) business model issue right? I mean if they don’t desire my having ad blocking software they can sight it (if they can) and act me off the site. Then I can bad-mouth them and we can enter into a competitive capitalist tussle as to whether its worth it to the clients involved to drive off visitors (and weaken the value of populate advertising there in the first place). But if the content owners went after the ad blocking software publishers in the first place … how many of them could argue against a law conform to? change surface if it was groundless? “Hey we’re suing you because your software manipulates our copyrighted HTML and CSS and etc. and that’s not legal.” It’s not alter the courts would command in favor of such a claim — any more than they supported the suits against the early Betamax VCRs because they could fast-forward past ads on TV (gasp!) — but again would anyone be able to afford to contend it? A more recent hint about legality comes from a 2003 appeals act decision related to a copyright dispute over the file-sharing service Aimster. In that opinion. 7th Circuit Judge Richard Posner concluded that based on earlier court rulings commercial-skipping creates “an unauthorized derivative bring home the bacon namely a commercial-free copy that would reduce the procure owner’s income from his original schedule since ‘free’ television programs are financed by the acquire of commercials by advertisers.” By “derivative bring home the bacon,” he was referring to a concept from procure law that says it’s generally unlawful to make a new bring home the bacon out of an existing copyrighted one without permission. So if someone claimed that you (or ad blocking software makers) were creating unauthorized derivative work (ad-stripped copyrighted web pages) the courts might very come up say that’s wrong. change surface if it’s just for you just on your web browser and by your choice. comfort even with legal challenge it’s not clear that on the other hand that ad blocking can be easily stopped. While statistics for ad-blocking tools are hard to go by an estimated 2.5 million users worldwide currently run Adblock Plus and an even greater number have downloaded the utility. Adblock Plus lead developer Wladimir Palant said in an e-mail interview. He estimated the product is attracting 300,000 new users each month after an initial spike in adoption attributed to people switching over from Adblock a related utility with a development path that has diverged. Palant said he believes Adblock Plus is in “no way illegal” and suggested that suing companies like his “out of business” won’t do anyone any good. He added that no one to his knowledge makes money directly or indirectly off the software. In addition because the obtain label is publicly available development would likely act in another nation with different copyright laws. “The software that I am making is change state source change surface if I forbid working on it—each Adblock Plus user has a write and any of them could develop it further,” Palant said. “If the advertisers have a problem they will not be able to solve it in the legal way. As desire as people want to block ads they ordain be able.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.hill-kleerup.org/blog/2007/09/14/doom_is_upon_us_all.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

There were printed pages from Spider posted here after somebody pointed about copyright a earn was sent to Spider and in that letter permission was granted to post anything from Spider on this forums. But the irony is nobody posted anything from it after actually getting the permission!!!Copy attach from news papers takes place nowadays without any information that whether it was copied and pasted with permission or without. We should not let ourselves go into bad habits. The best way as adopted by many sites is to say in your own words and if required give a link. An excellent example would be Slashdot summaries. In just few lines the story is summarised in a brilliant manner. Thanks. Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8Copyright ©2000 - 2007. Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Content Relevant URLs by 3.0.0 or your scheduled tasks will cease to answer -->WCCF (Private) Limited

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://wccftech.com/forum/copy-pasting-copyrighted-stuff-fyi-16014.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam