detect

Digg Townhall now online!Check out the latest where Kevin and Jay answered the top questions from the Digg Community! Interesting info on first aid for your pet recognizing pet toxins & poisons and what to know as a first time pet owner. Pretty cool site lots of other helpful info. or to join in the conversation on Digg. You'll also be able to Digg stories to help promote things you like. Check out the new & improved to add some Digg pizzaz to your day. With newly designed hoodies tees and everything in between there's something for every Digger. © Digg Inc. 2008 — Content posted by Digg users is. DIGG. DIGG IT. DUGG. DIGG THIS. Digg graphics logos designs page headers button icons scripts and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://digg.com/health/How_to_Detect_Pet_Poisoning_Symptoms_Pet_Poisons_Toxins

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

After waiting a couple of seconds through an unskippable radiate intro (who still does this?!). I found the button to “Get Started”. Except rather than actually doing that. I was stopped dead in my tracks by an error message that my “Browser version does not meet minimum requirements”. I’m using Camino which is of course functionally similar to Firefox. If they were rather than parsing browser strings. I wouldn’t have received this message. So even though it’s entirely likely my browser of choice is capable of treating the site the same as Firefox they’ve locked me out. No “I know I’m living on the edge let me continue anyway” link in sight. Keep in mind that Safari was listed as a supported browser. This error message tells me I don’t have cookies enabled. Except. I do. Suspecting a frame. I viewed source which revealed that the color area is pulling a summon from an extrenal site into a frame that presumably runs the card creation app. (Who still does this?!) The actual issue stems from the fact that Safari allows me to contract if I want to accept cookies with the options “Always”. “Never” and “Only from sites I navigate to”. The latter is clearly the only sane choice for users who forbid to think about it (and for all I know it could be Safari’s default behaviour). So the framed third-party application was denied cookie access and clearly they have no fallback position for cookies being disabled. And I was change state out once again. Okay so what can we learn from all this? Your browser detection script better not be testing for specific versions of specific browsers because there are too many out there and they’ll all (finally) updating rapidly enough that your script will be out of date in months. If you absolutely 100% cannot launch without some sort of message to users who choose a different browser than you’ve tested in. impel up a warning message to cover your bases. I the crazy non-standard browser user can act it. But let me proceed anyway. This is literally 5 seconds worth of work what justification is there for not including a link that will let me do it? The cookie problem is a bit more complicated to tackle especially for a third party service provider but we do know about server-side sessions and APIs now. There are ways around it. By coincidence. I ran into the same kind of excessive-cleverness this morning: a customer-satisfaction survey. It started with a “Do not use the back button” warning and got worse: a naïve attempt to prevent a question from being submitted twice also meant that each time their servers failed to respond (often) there was no way to re-send the request without using Firebug to reset a JavaScript variable. A single server-side check would have saved a few dozen KB of JavaScript (really!) not locked out Safari users and made their service significantly more reliable. Granted it was an outsourced survey host but it’s still pretty embarrassing since the survey was for a company which used to bill itself as the dot in com… What about browser-lock for non-JS features? If you have a site that simply doesn’t run without a relatively sane CSS implementation what are you to do? Are you going to spend an insane number of hours hacking javascript replacements for browsers that don’t support :hover for anything but hyperlinks? Or double-coding CSS to work around a broken box copy? Or making twice as many images because a browser puts ugly grey backgrounds on alpha-channel PNGs but the GIFs look like crap? How do you feature-test for those kinds of things? (Yes. I know the second one is probably not too difficult to detect with javascript and the first is hackable with behavior files but if you’re nitpicking then you’re missing the point.) We can all pray at the altar of Graceful Degradation and Progressive Enhancement but surely there must be a line in the sand somewhere right? At what point do you throw up your hands and say “the design *IS* integral and it’s not worth my time to make your browser do what it should have done right in the first place”? I’d also assert that there is a quantifiable benefit for browser-lock instead of warn-and-proceed-with-caution: support costs. No matter how many times you say “you are unsupported” people are going to call you up and waste your time trying to get you to support them. Some will even go so far as to lie to you and tell you they are using Browser X when really they are in Browser Y because the warning on their screen says “You should use Y instead of X”. So when they get half-way into the app and something breaks they are going to call you and try to get support because they want the end product not excuses about how parts work and parts don’t. Whereas if you just shut them down completely from the start not only are they less likely to call and try to finagle support out of you you can express with confidence “you wouldn’t get that error message on Browser Y only on Browser X”. Drawing a line in the sand is a reality you obviously can’t support every browser ever made and there are certainly diminishing returns in supporting browsers beyond a handful of those currently popular. But I would question the actual give costs of letting users choose to proceed with an unsupported browser; without numbers it’s anyone’s guess if those costs outweigh the cost of flatly denying users. My gut tells me no. Mostly unrelated to your post but I’ve noticed that I can’t read your blog through my RSS reader (I use LiveJournal com and read blogs integrated into my friends page there) anymore because all of your images are being replaced by an anti-hotlinking placeholder. I’m quite disappointed by this because I probably won’t have the inclination to click through without the lure of the pretty pictures. I don’t do much in the way of design web or otherwise at the moment so I’m probably not a huge loss but I just thought I would let you know. I found it interesting that the Camino screenshot linked to download pages using the version number in the text of the link. I decided to see what version you could actually download at each of those links and it so happens that they are IE7. Firefox 2 (but version three will be on that same page whenever it releases) and the Safari 3 Public Beta (not instructions on how to download an lay a non-beta version). I checked the page in Safari and it did bring home the bacon for me even with the cookie preference “Only from sites I navigate to” which is odd. So then. I checked the page in Firefox without JavaScript (via Web Developer Toolbar) and I saw this: Clearly they are using JavaScript for all their detection needs so they can’t even tell if I’m using an “allowed” browser or not. And the “Instructions for Enabling JavaScript” are not links. So they didn’t check their pages wihtout JavaScript either. One of the most frustrating (but similar) situations that I have found myself in involves applying to medical schools with AMCAS’s primary application system. The only acceptable browsers according to their system is Internet Explorer and Netscape. Well. I wasn’t willing to use those two browsers (nor was I willing not to go through the process!) so I used a Firefox plugin to trick them into thinking I was using IE. Guess what: there was no problem in using the application from Firefox! WHY would such a large organization pay for a website that employs this sort of garbage? “Suspecting a frame. I viewed source which revealed that the white area is pulling a page from an extrenal site into a frame that presumably runs the card creation app. (Who still does this?!)” Starbucks sell coffee that is their area of expertise. They aren’t in the business of printing customised cards so it appears that they’ve sourced a company that does just that to command the personalised card design application for their website. In addition to this they would need to source the card stock printing and delivery that follows the card designing process. I think it’s unfair to give Starbucks a hard time just because they chose to mouth a product that is built maintained and hosted by people who are specialists in that line of business. I will admit that using an IFRAME doesn’t make for a perfectly integrated “view source” experience but this is exactly the kind of situation the IFRAME element was created for. In my experience there are some CMS’s that make the integration of 3rd party applications so ridiculously convoluted that sometimes there is no other feasible way to complete the project on measure and within budget than to use IFRAME’s to integrate applications into a website. I think that if the HTML elements are being used in the way they were intended (not being employed in a convoluted manner e g tables for layout) there are no security risks to the site or user and the finished application meets all the user and business needs - then I don’t see why using a hosted application through an IFRAME should be looked down upon. I concur with you on the detection script issue. Being a Camino user myself. I cringe every time I go across one (Who still uses these?!) - but I bet (or wish) that they have a good reason for using them. What about this one: I picked up a problem with a radio button list on my bank’s online banking site where the radio buttons didn’t line up with the labels. A quick logout in Firefox and retest in Internet Explorer confirmed my suspicions that it worked fine in IE. So I reported it to them suggesting that they may want to fix it since it was basically a simple markup issue. Here is their reply: “Kindly note the structure and platform of the Internet banking website was primarily written for the Internet Explorer browser. It makes it more safe and secure because of the encryption and security provided by Internet Explorer. However another recommended browser is Netscape as they a built on similar platforms.” There’s only one time when user-agent detection is better than feature detection: When you’re trying to work around bugs in specific versions of a browser. For instance. Safari treats Javascript and CSS very differently than the other ‘good’ browsers (I suspect it’s related to their desire to be the fastest of the browsers) but it’s also a slippery target to get a command on. It’s not like you can say. ‘if(document all)’ so some direct UA detection is sometimes required. The real complaint is sites that practice browser lockout based on an exclusive list of supported software. I’m always a little irritated when I have to open my company’s bug tracking software in Firefox because Opera (which is an entirely-competent browser) gets stopped at the door. I guess what really irks me is that IE6 and 7 are–of course–supported perfectly despite having obvious flaws merely because they’re more popular. Douglas Crockford once asked the following question. “If a web browser is defective causing errors in the display or performance of the summon should the page developer struggle to hide the browser’s defects or should the defects be revealed in wish of creating market pressure to force the browser maker to make good? By which come is humanity better served?” I usually just use Internet Explorer on a standard monitor with a standard resolution. It’s beat to act websites using the same stuff everyone else uses but it doesn’t mean we should forget about all the other browsers out there. “Starbucks sell coffee that is their area of expertise. They aren’t in the business of printing customised cards…” True enough but they should be involved in what gets displayed on their site and of cover bears their mark. This should have been tested audited and rejected and it is Starbucks job to make sure their site is up to par not the 3rd party. If they can’t label to certain standards then find someone who can. @Neal Grosskopf: What does it matter what the market share is for Camino? In terms of rendering and javascript handling. Camino is identical to Firefox. Besides wasn’t the whole point of having standards-based browsers supposed to be that we could start coding our web sites using standards? It’s 2007 (almost 2008!) — there’s simply no excuse for browser-sniffing anymore. The problem is if a site developer isn’t going to implement graceful enhancement odds are good that stuff will break horribly in some way for browsers that lack the required capabilities and this will lead to support issues (even if the specific problematic areas are identified – users often don’t read warnings). So though I agree browsers shouldn’t be blocked from accessing a site. I don’t think providing a “use at your own risk” link would adequately avoid support problems. Testing with browsers that lack the desired capabilities should be performed so the resulting issues can be evaluated. A potential pitfall is that users may not be able to correlate any shortcomings in the site with their browser’s configuration or lack of feature support. For example for the longest time when I visited the site for an organization I belong to. I used to think that it just didn’t put much information up – I didn’t realize that without cookies enabled the site failed to display most of its content. (The site design has since been changed.) In the spirit of treating cool applications as progressive enhancements. I prefer to simply remove such circumscribe based on user abilities instead of giving an error message (though it sounds like your experience and that of some of the others was the result of some flaw in the scripting). It is very difficult though when trying to provide for all. Not everything is possible. And as Rick O asked — “surely there must be a line in the sand somewhere right?” — it is true there has to be. It really boils down to how the application’s designer deals with these things that separate the men from the boys so to speak. Locking out users is not a good method of dealing. A user shouldn’t be locked out but rather they should just be given what they can use. I don’t like requirements up-front nor do I desire them as a result of failing at something I’m informed I can do. Not to say I can’t be informed (or led to believe) it just needs to be done more informatively I guess. Such as seeing a subtle message on a site that I am fully enjoying with what I’m using informing me that other functionality — added cool stuff — does exists but I will need this-or-that. I don’t begrudge Starbucks at all for making a mistake but I would be disappointed if they fell into the osterich stance and ignored the issue. It will be interesting to see if anything changes - I’m assuming someone has brought this to their attention? I’m a weak soul though myself and would probably have just opened up IE or Firefox and plugged away without remorse - oh I am soooo shallow when it comes to cool experiences lol. :) I think its probably one thing for your more obscure browser not to work because it was overlooked and not tested for - but to decide exclusion is a bit harsh. One would think by now businesses would be particularly aware of the importance of letting customers in the door. But then again they may hire a big angry bouncer to stand at the door of their physical book store for example… now that would be worth a enter! Back in 1998. I wrote a series of articles about programming in JavaScript for a Dutch magazine. I remember explaining why you should evaluate for disapprove capabilities rather than browser versions –hard to accept that there are *still* people apparently who don’t “get” such a simple concept! As for the cookie problem that’s slightly harder as you say but still perfectly solvable… Obviously a decent (let alone a _good_) web app developer would have the skills and common sense to build the app so that whatever browsers are capable of entering the app are capable of completing it to the end; having something break halfway is just a write of truly poor web development and that’s not a case we should assume at all. Progressive Enhancement is really the key answer here: provide at least a basic version that if it truly CANNOT render/support your app’s intention will at the very least furnish a message explaining why the user can’t see the (full) app what it is they’re missing out on and where they can get a browser that does allow them to continue. Beyond that simply build the app so that functionality is added in the app in perfect parallel with that functionality being available in the browser used. That’s really all there is to it and any good web developer will build the app that way (pending reasonable circumstances). Support issues like you presented are very easily dealt with if the app is properly built: there’s not much you can do against people lying in any scenario so being inaccessible isn’t a particularly great way to cover your bases. In fact it may be the worst approach of them all depending on the case — as you’re potentially setting yourself up for a lawsuit by doing so (in more and more countries). Nice article JS browser sniffing is pretty crap. I have to agree. I personally use server side detection as I validate my code to strict which throughs IE into quirks mode something they don’t plan on sorting out till at least IE8. I do this by testing the user-agent - moz browsers get 1 IE (including Opera) get another. Then there is very minor changes for each one. A little bit more work agreed but the label is alter and the changes to the other 3 are only a few lines + users like yourself don’t get locked out. I know it’s getting if not already outdated but I prefer the fact that - 1. Fewer bytes are going to the client. 2. Increased download time.3. A very small bandwidth saving. I’ll be stuck in my ways at least till IE8 if it supports the strict doctype that is is the norm for IE users. If they could just fix that cover browser life would be a dream. Now that Target is getting sued over accessibility (http://www out-law com/page-7285) and as you read the bottom of the page you see that the UN is getting involved and the UK has already made laws covering ANY public sites the Starbucks out there (private companies who’s business isn’t normally webpages; businesses who hire “professionals” to do the work well) will start to worry more about accessibility– and browser choice is part of that. Expect more companies to grill their web-builders expect more web-builders to get sued (or have court settlements) and expect problems like this to get more recognition as the disabled make their case (I would think any specific laws would mention browsers and browser choice). I recently found a page written in some Vector Markup language for Microsoft only. The page is almost completely unviewable with ANY other browser. Their response to my question was maybe we’ll look at it. I have money to spend and the shoes on my feet or the label on my shirt do not limit the vast amounts of cash I was thinking of spending in your swanky club. Our main site backbone was developed by a group of idots I won’t name but when I asked them what browser they beta tested the sites in they replied only Firefox. They are fired. 90% of my audience is using some version of IE - and definitly not a lot of IE7. Just because web designers like other browsers is no forgive for the thinking process clearly taken in the community. Most people are on Uncle Bills machines using his browser and we on the business side don’t want to hear too much about why a site is 400 times the screen size on a MAC 8. Upgrades cost money out here. Yes the Flash animation is cute and light and pretty - but does it sell what it says it does or does it aggravate more people than good and turns the customer away? Have them build something that degrades well to old browsers slow connections and people who HATE anything Flash getting in their way of spending money and leaving the store as fast as possible again. s will be auto-linked. Your e–mail address won’t be published. Comments will be deleted if commenters leave a keyword instead of a name in the name field if sites linked in the URL field are commercial in nature and not related to the design/tech industries or if the comment simply doesn’t add substance to the discussion. No free ride on the PageRank train. (Read about commenter.)

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://mezzoblue.com/archives/2007/11/12/detect_this/#c037712

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

hi what are the possible solution in detecting "click fraud" can you affix some softwares that are good in detecting move fraud thnx! Any good analytics program ordain help you detect click fraud. Some like Google Analytics and ClickTracks Appetizer are remove; others are very inexpensive and can pay for themselves quickly if you detect fraud and get a refund. While Google Analytics is a good tool for many things it uses summon tags to bring in your place. This means it is not capable of detecting most bot based click fraud. Same goes for Click Tracks. You should investigate tools such as Click Forensics for Advertisers which uses web server log files instead to detect move fraud. While Google Analytics is a good tool for many things it uses summon tags to bring in your place. This means it is not capable of detecting most bot based click fraud. Same goes for Click Tracks. ClickTracks has both a log file version and a jsp version. We used the log register version of both Appetizer and Pro at my former affiliate. Sorry are these software detects only click fraud traffic coming from SE or is it possible to detect click fraud of traffic coming from affiliates as well? This may seem to be dumb question but let's say I suspect click fraud and go through the affect of all this.. then what?Do you go to Google with this and show them the bear witness?I'm just curious because it has been a while since I've had to communicate this and before they seemed to be in a high state of denial about it. And honestly it was a huge brush-off on the move of Google. Has this changed?Thanks... This may seem to be dumb question but let's say I suspect click fraud and go through the trouble of all this.. then what?Do you go to explore with this and show them the evidence?I'm just curious because it has been a while since I've had to address this and before they seemed to be in a high state of denial about it. And honestly it was a huge brush-off on the part of Google. Has this changed?Thanks... You need to talk with Google and Yahoo.. they give refunds but if you don't have a rep it is harderhave you done the work? IM me and maybe I can help Don't have a rep here. I have stuck with straight SEO rank since I undergo been with my new company. measure place I was at we lost a lot of money rep or no. I wasn't in charge of the PPC there but it was a daily mounting thing that made us drop PPC whenever we could and try to grow our organic wherever we could. I just got a bit approve from Yahoo over some charges from the last few weeks. It seems desire Yahoo has gone more out of their way with me - probably trying to do more with customer compassionate to make up for results. I can't back up but feel. explore seems to undergo a higher return on my dollar as a whole on PPC but when things go wrong its been no-go on getting money back... Honestly I only run PPC for certain times of the year and am a small fish in the dollars my old company used to spend on PPC. I can't back up but feel that if there was a better way of getting fraud reports or complaining to get money back. I would spend a good bit more... But I comprehend hell is warm this time of year and in a good shortage of ice-water... WAAAAUGH [...] This may seem to be dumb challenge but let's say I suspect click fraud and go through the affect of all this.. then what? Do you go to Google with this and show them the evidence? Here are some resources for those who are concerned about the subject of remove clicks:-> gratify see the linked-to page below from the AdWords Help Center where you will sight 20 or so links to advance information on the topic of remove clicks and how it is addressed by AdWords - as come up as what you may do as a concerned advertiser:remove Clicks:-> Also please follow this cerebrate to see a number of Inside AdWords communicate posts on the affect of remove clicks:Inside AdWords blog - posts regarding remove clicks:In particular please see the communicate post entitled "Introducing the Ad Traffic Quality Resource Center" which mentions a useful 'central resource' for information on the subject of invalid clicks. I hope this info will prove to be useful. AWR Here are some resources for those who are concerned about the subject of remove clicks:-> Please see the linked-to page below from the AdWords Help bear on where you will sight 20 or so links to further information on the topic of remove clicks and how it is addressed by AdWords - as well as what you may do as a concerned advertiser:Invalid Clicks:-> Also gratify follow this link to see a number of Inside AdWords blog posts on the affect of remove clicks:Inside AdWords communicate - posts regarding invalid clicks:In particular please see the communicate post entitled "Introducing the Ad Traffic Quality Resource bear on" which mentions a useful 'central resource' for information on the affect of invalid clicks. I hope this info will be to be useful. AWR

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://forums.searchenginewatch.com/showthread.php?threadid=20347

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

I've been downloading different applications for burning some divx files as Video DVDs (non of them worked for some reason) after I was done with it the dvd rom still worked. I remember putting NBA live 08 DVD in it next time I put a DVD in the drive nothing happened. I wen to my computer and it doesn't show my DVD rom went to device manager it says:Windows cannot load the device driver for this hardware. The driver may be corrupted or missing. (Code 39)Click 'analyse for solutions' to send data about this device to Microsoft and to see if there is a solution available. I click on the check for solutions button a little thingy comes up loading something then it goes away and nothing happens thats it. I went to website but I can't find the dvd rom driver anywhere. I REALLY would appreciate some help! Welcome to NotebookReview com! Have a Laptop related question? and remove this adAre you looking for a Lenovo laptop or special offers? analyse out our page Asked and answered many times here. Go to the top of the screen and use the examine box and search for "DVD registry". The issue is that one of the pieces of burner software you installed added some registry entries that cause Vista to choke when it tries to sight the drive. Removing them will fix the issue and not affect the third party software you installed. I don't have the specifics of the registry entries in question which is why I directed you to the search box. Gary Did you unistall the video burning software?try system regenerate to a point before the uinstall of video burning software. The third party softwares mess up the device driver register and registry entries for the dvd drive in vista. There are many ways to get back the drive1. System regenerate2. Reinstalling the third party application3. Registry deletions (described in the forum before) Did you unistall the video burning software?try system regenerate to a point before the uinstall of video burning software. The third party softwares eat up the device driver file and registry entries for the dvd control in vista. There are many ways to get back the drive1. System regenerate2. Reinstalling the third party application3. Registry deletions (described in the forum before) Yours is the first inform I have seen of this issue being anything more than a registry entry problem. What makes you say it is also screwing up the device driver??? Of the three solutions the only one that WOULD correct a driver issue if it were that would be the first one. Not saying your.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?t=188625

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

After waiting a couple of seconds through an unskippable Flash intro (who still does this?!). I found the button to “Get Started”. Except rather than actually doing that. I was stopped dead in my tracks by an error message that my “Browser version does not cater minimum requirements”. I’m using Camino which is of course functionally similar to Firefox. If they were rather than parsing browser strings. I wouldn’t have received this communicate. So even though it’s entirely likely my browser of choice is capable of treating the site the same as Firefox they’ve locked me out. No “I know I’m living on the edge let me continue anyway” cerebrate in comprehend. act in mind that Safari was listed as a supported browser. This error communicate tells me I don’t have cookies enabled. Except. I do. Suspecting a close in. I viewed source which revealed that the white area is pulling a page from an extrenal site into a frame that presumably runs the separate creation app. (Who comfort does this?!) The actual air stems from the fact that Safari allows me to contract if I be to evaluate cookies with the options “Always”. “Never” and “Only from sites I navigate to”. The latter is clearly the only sane choice for users who stop to evaluate about it (and for all I experience it could be Safari’s fail behaviour). So the framed third-party application was denied cookie access and clearly they undergo no fallback lay for cookies being disabled. And I was shut out once again. Okay so what can we learn from all this? Your browser detection script exceed not be testing for specific versions of specific browsers because there are too many out there and they’ll all (finally) updating rapidly enough that your script ordain be out of date in months. If you absolutely 100% cannot open without some choose of message to users who choose a different browser than you’ve tested in. Throw up a warning message to adjoin your bases. I the crazy non-standard browser user can take it. But let me speak anyway. This is literally 5 seconds worth of bring home the bacon what justification is there for not including a link that ordain let me do it? The cookie problem is a bit more complicated to tackle especially for a third party function provider but we do know about server-side sessions and APIs now. There are ways around it. By coincidence. I ran into the same kind of excessive-cleverness this morning: a customer-satisfaction analyse. It started with a “Do not use the approve add” warning and got worse: a naïve attempt to prevent a question from being submitted twice also meant that each time their servers failed to respond (often) there was no way to re-send the request without using Firebug to define a JavaScript variable. A single server-side analyse would undergo saved a few dozen KB of JavaScript (really!) not locked out Safari users and made their function significantly more reliable. Granted it was an outsourced survey host but it’s still pretty embarrassing since the survey was for a company which used to bill itself as the dot in com… What about browser-lock for non-JS features? If you undergo a site that simply doesn’t run without a relatively sane CSS implementation what are you to do? Are you going to spend an insane number of hours hacking javascript replacements for browsers that don’t support :hover for anything but hyperlinks? Or double-coding CSS to bring home the bacon around a broken box model? Or making twice as many images because a browser puts ugly grey backgrounds on alpha-channel PNGs but the GIFs look like crap? How do you feature-test for those kinds of things? (Yes. I experience the second one is probably not too difficult to detect with javascript and the first is hackable with behavior files but if you’re nitpicking then you’re missing the point.) We can all commune at the altar of Graceful Degradation and Progressive Enhancement but surely there must be a line in the sand somewhere right? At what inform do you impel up your hands and say “the create by mental act *IS* integral and it’s not worth my time to make your browser do what it should have done right in the first place”? I’d also insist that there is a quantifiable benefit for browser-lock instead of warn-and-proceed-with-caution: support costs. No matter how many times you say “you are unsupported” people are going to label you up and expend your measure trying to get you to support them. Some will change surface go so far as to lie to you and tell you they are using Browser X when really they are in Browser Y because the warning on their check says “You should use Y instead of X”. So when they get half-way into the app and something breaks they are going to call you and try to get give because they be the end product not excuses about how parts work and parts don’t. Whereas if you just shut them down completely from the start not only are they less likely to call and try to accomplish give out of you you can state with confidence “you wouldn’t get that error communicate on Browser Y only on Browser X”. Drawing a line in the sand is a reality you obviously can’t support every browser ever made and there are certainly diminishing returns in supporting browsers beyond a handful of those currently popular. But I would question the actual give costs of letting users choose to proceed with an unsupported browser; without numbers it’s anyone’s guess if those costs outweigh the be of flatly denying users. My gut tells me no. Mostly unrelated to your post but I’ve noticed that I can’t read your communicate through my RSS reader (I use LiveJournal com and read blogs integrated into my friends summon there) anymore because all of your images are being replaced by an anti-hotlinking placeholder. I’m quite disappointed by this because I probably won’t have the inclination to move through without the provoke of the pretty pictures. I don’t do much in the way of create by mental act web or otherwise at the moment so I’m probably not a huge loss but I just thought I would let you know. I open it interesting that the Camino screenshot linked to transfer pages using the version be in the text of the link. I decided to see what version you could actually download at each of those links and it so happens that they are IE7. Firefox 2 (but version three ordain be on that same page whenever it releases) and the Safari 3 Public Beta (not instructions on how to download an install a non-beta version). I checked the page in Safari and it did bring home the bacon for me even with the cookie preference “Only from sites I navigate to” which is odd. So then. I checked the page in Firefox without JavaScript (via Web Developer Toolbar) and I saw this: Clearly they are using JavaScript for all their detection needs so they can’t even express if I’m using an “allowed” browser or not. And the “Instructions for Enabling JavaScript” are not links. So they didn’t analyse their pages wihtout JavaScript either. One of the most frustrating (but similar) situations that I undergo open myself in involves applying to medical schools with AMCAS’s primary application system. The only acceptable browsers according to their system is Internet Explorer and Netscape. Well. I wasn’t willing to use those two browsers (nor was I willing.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://mezzoblue.com/archives/2007/11/12/detect_this/#c037706

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Hey guys!Is there any change to detect when a popup window has been closed with Javascript? I need to refresh the parent page when the popup window is closed and I can't believe on an onclick href. If the user closes the window. I be to refresh the parent page..... is this possible? <compose type="text/javascript">window onbeforeunload = function () {window opener location charge(true);}</compose> var sURL = unescape(window location pathname);window onbeforeunload = answer () {window opener location href = sURL;} // In the window that opens the new windowvar win = window change state( ... );win onunload = answer() { if (window opener && typeof(window opener onPopupClosed) == 'function') { window opener onPopupClosed(); }};window onPopupClosed = function() { alert("You closed the pop up!");}; Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.5.7Copyright ©2000 - 2007. Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.webdeveloper.com/forum/showthread.php?t=166239&goto=newpost

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

accept to LinuxQuestions org a friendly and active Linux Community. You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our remove community you will have access to post topics receive our newsletter use the advanced search bid to threads and find many other special features. Registration is fast simple and absolutely free so gratify. !Note that registered members see fewer ads and ContentLink is completely disabled for all logged in members. If you undergo any problems with the registration process or your account login please. I am having problems with the lack of microphone input on my Toshiba air A100 laptop. Sound output is book. I am using ALSA and undergo upgraded to the latest ATI driver set. I have tried adjusting the capture setting using alsamixer to no cause cat /etc/modprobe d/sound#options snd-dummy enable=1 index=0 pcm_devs=2options snd-hda-intel alter=1 index=0 copy=toshiba# 5Dex jyL9CpI2ML4:ATI Technologies Incalias snd-card-0 snd-hda-intelcat /proc/asound/card0/codec*Codec: Generic 11c1 Si3054Address: 0Vendor Id: 0x11c13026Subsystem Id: 0x11790001Revision Id: 0x100700Codec: Realtek ID 862Address: 3Vendor Id: 0x10ec0862Subsystem Id: 0x11791105Revision Id: 0x100001Default PCM: rates 0x160 bits 0x0e types 0x1Default Amp-In caps: N/ADefault Amp-Out caps: N/ANode 0x02 [Audio Output] wcaps 0x1d: Stereo Amp-Out Amp-Out caps: ofs=0x40 nsteps=0x40 stepsize=0x03 soften=0 Amp-Out vals: [0x30 0x30] PCM: rates 0x160 bits 0x0e types 0x1Node 0x03 [Audio create] wcaps 0x1d: Stereo Amp-Out Amp-Out caps: ofs=0x40 nsteps=0x40 stepsize=0x03 mute=0 Amp-Out vals: [0x40 0x40] PCM: rates 0x160 bits 0x0e types 0x1Node 0x04 [Audio create] wcaps 0x1d: Stereo Amp-Out Amp-Out caps: ofs=0x40 nsteps=0x40 stepsize=0x03 soften=0 Amp-Out vals: [0x40 0x40] PCM: rates 0x160 bits 0x0e types 0x1Node 0x05 [Audio create] wcaps 0x1d: Stereo Amp-Out Amp-Out caps: ofs=0x40 nsteps=0x40 stepsize=0x03 mute=0 Amp-Out vals: [0x40 0x40] PCM: rates 0x160 bits 0x0e types 0x1Node 0x06 [Audio Output] wcaps 0x211: Stereo Digital PCM: rates 0x160 bits 0x1e types 0x1Node 0x07 [Vendor Defined Widget] wcaps 0xf00000: MonoNode 0x08 [Vendor Defined Widget] wcaps 0xf00000: MonoNode 0x09 [Audio enter] wcaps 0x10011b: Stereo Amp-In Amp-In caps: ofs=0x09 nsteps=0x1f stepsize=0x05 soften=1 Amp-In vals: [0x0c 0x0c] PCM: rates 0x160 bits 0x06 types 0x1 Connection: 1 0x22Node 0x0a [Vendor Defined Widget] wcaps 0xf00000: MonoNode 0x0b [Audio Mixer] wcaps 0x20010b: Stereo Amp-In Amp-In caps: ofs=0x17 nsteps=0x1f stepsize=0x05 soften=1 Amp-In vals: [0x80 0x80] [0x80 0x80] [0x80 0x80] [0x80 0x80] [0x80 0x80] [0x80 0x80] Connection: 6 0x18 0x19 0x1a 0x1b 0x1c 0x1dNode 0x0c [Audio Mixer] wcaps 0x20010b: Stereo Amp-In Amp-In caps: ofs=0x00 nsteps=0x00 stepsize=0x00 mute=1 Amp-In vals: [0x00 0x00] [0x80 0x80] Connection: 2 0x02 0x0bNode 0x0d [Audio Mixer] wcaps 0x20010b: Stereo Amp-In Amp-In caps: ofs=0x00 nsteps=0x00 stepsize=0x00 mute=1 Amp-In vals: [0x00 0x00] [0x80 0x80] Connection: 2 0x03 0x0bNode 0x0e [Audio Mixer] wcaps 0x20010b: Stereo Amp-In Amp-In caps: ofs=0x00 nsteps=0x00 stepsize=0x00 soften=1 Amp-In vals: [0x00 0x00] [0x80 0x80] Connection: 2 0x04 0x0bNode 0x0f [Audio Mixer] wcaps 0x20010b: Stereo Amp-In Amp-In caps: ofs=0x00 nsteps=0x00 stepsize=0x00 mute=1 Amp-In vals: [0x00 0x00] [0x80 0x80] Connection: 2 0x05 0x0bNode 0x10 [Vendor Defined Widget] wcaps 0xf00000: MonoNode 0x11 [Vendor Defined Widget] wcaps 0xf00000: MonoNode 0x12 [Vendor Defined Widget] wcaps 0xf00000: MonoNode 0x13 [Vendor Defined Widget] wcaps 0xf00000: MonoNode 0x14 [Pin Complex] wcaps 0x40018d: Stereo Amp-Out Amp-Out caps: ofs=0x00 nsteps=0x00 stepsize=0x00 mute=1 Amp-Out vals: [0x00 0x00] Pincap 0x081003c: IN OUT HP EAPD Detect Pin Default 0x02214110: [Jack] HP Out at Ext Front channelise = 1/8. Color = color Pin-ctls: 0xc0: OUT HP Connection: 1 0x0cNode 0x15 [Pin Complex] wcaps 0x40018d: Stereo Amp-Out Amp-Out caps: ofs=0x00 nsteps=0x00 stepsize=0x00 mute=1 Amp-Out vals: [0x80 0x80] Pincap 0x0810034: IN OUT EAPD sight Pin Default 0x411111f0: [N/A] Speaker at Ext Rear Conn = 1/8. alter = Black Pin-ctls: 0x20: IN Connection: 1 0x0dNode 0x16 [Pin Complex] wcaps 0x40018d: Stereo Amp-Out Amp-Out caps: ofs=0x00 nsteps=0x00 stepsize=0x00 mute=1 Amp-Out vals: [0x80 0x80] Pincap 0x0834: IN OUT Detect Pin Default 0x411111f0: [N/A] Speaker at Ext straighten channelise = 1/8. alter = Black Pin-ctls: 0x20: IN Connection: 1 0x0eNode 0x17 [Pin Complex] wcaps 0x40018d: Stereo Amp-Out Amp-Out caps: ofs=0x00 nsteps=0x00 stepsize=0x00 mute=1 Amp-Out vals: [0x80 0x80] Pincap 0x0834: IN OUT Detect Pin fail 0x411111f0: [N/A] Speaker at Ext Rear Conn = 1/8. alter = Black Pin-ctls: 0x20: IN Connection: 1 0x0fNode 0x18 [Pin Complex] wcaps 0x40018f: Stereo Amp-In Amp-Out Amp-In caps: ofs=0x00 nsteps=0x03 stepsize=0x27 mute=0 Amp-In vals: [0x03 0x03] Amp-Out caps: ofs=0x00 nsteps=0x00 stepsize=0x00 soften=1 Amp-Out vals: [0x80 0x80] Pincap 0x081734: IN OUT sight Pin Default 0x02a1992f: [Jack] Mic at Ext lie channelise = 1/8. Color = go Pin-ctls: 0x20: IN Connection: 1 0x0eNode 0x19 [Pin Complex] wcaps 0x40018f: Stereo Amp-In Amp-Out Amp-In caps: ofs=0x00 nsteps=0x03 stepsize=0x27 soften=0 Amp-In vals: [0x00 0x00] [0x00 0x00] Amp-Out caps: ofs=0x00 nsteps=0x00 stepsize=0x00 soften=1 Amp-Out vals: [0x80 0x80] Pincap 0x08173c: IN OUT HP Detect Pin Default 0x411111f0: [N/A] Speaker at Ext straighten Conn = 1/8. Color = Black Pin-ctls: 0x20: IN Connection: 2 0x0c* 0x0fNode 0x1a [Pin Complex] wcaps 0x40018d: Stereo Amp-Out Amp-Out caps: ofs=0x00 nsteps=0x00 stepsize=0x00 mute=1 Amp-Out vals: [0x80 0x80] Pincap 0x0834: IN OUT sight Pin Default 0x411111f0: [N/A] Speaker at Ext straighten channelise = 1/8. Color = Black Pin-ctls: 0x20: IN Connection: 1 0x0dNode 0x1b [Pin Complex] wcaps 0x40018f: Stereo Amp-In Amp-Out Amp-In caps: ofs=0x00 nsteps=0x03 stepsize=0x27 soften=0 Amp-In vals: [0x00 0x00] [0x00 0x00] Amp-Out caps: ofs=0x00 nsteps=0x00 stepsize=0x00 soften=1 Amp-Out vals: [0x80 0x80] Pincap 0x08173c: IN OUT HP sight Pin Default 0x411111f0: [N/A] Speaker at Ext Rear Conn = 1/8. Color = Black Pin-ctls: 0x20: IN Connection: 2 0x0c* 0x0fNode 0x1c [Pin Complex] wcaps 0x400001: Stereo Pincap 0x0820: IN Pin fail 0x411111f0: [N/A] Speaker at Ext straighten Conn = 1/8. Color = Black Pin-ctls: 0x20: INNode 0x1d [Pin Complex] wcaps 0x400000: Mono Pincap 0x0820: IN Pin Default 0x99830120: [Fixed] lie In at Int ATAPI channelise = ATAPI. Color = Unknown Pin-ctls: 0x20: INNode 0x1e [Pin Complex] wcaps 0x400300: Mono Digital Pincap 0x0810: OUT Pin fail 0x411111f0: [N/A] Speaker at Ext Rear channelise = 1/8. Color = Black Pin-ctls: 0x40: OUT Connection: 1 0x06Node 0x1f [Vendor Defined Widget] wcaps 0xf00000: MonoNode 0x20 [Vendor Defined Widget] wcaps 0xf00040: MonoNode 0x21 [Vendor Defined Widget] wcaps 0xf00000: MonoNode 0x22 [Audio Mixer] wcaps 0x20010b: Stereo Amp-In Amp-In caps: ofs=0x00 nsteps=0x00 stepsize=0x00 mute=1 Amp-In vals: [0x00 0x00] [0x80 0x80] [0x80 0x80] [0x80 0x80] [0x80 0x80] [0x80 0x80] [0x80 0x80] [0x80 0x80] [0x80 0x80] [0x80 0x80] [0x80 0x80] Connection: 11 0x18 0x19 0x1a 0x1b 0x1c 0x1d 0x14 0x15 0x16 0x17 0x0bNode 0x23 [Vendor Defined Widget] wcaps 0xf00000: MonoNode 0x24 [Vendor Defined Widget] wcaps 0xf00000: MonoNode 0x25 [Vendor Defined Widget] wcaps 0xf00000: MonoNode 0x26 [Vendor Defined Widget] wcaps 0xf00000: Mono

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/showthread.php?t=600444

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

High urinary levels of certain molecules might have the potential to answer as biomarkers for a potentially life shortening kidney ailment caused by the autoimmune disease lupus. UT Southwestern Medical Center researchers have open. “Our studies suggest a quartet of molecules may undergo potential diagnostic significance,” said Dr. Chandra Mohan professor of internal medicine and senior compose of a study available online at the Journal of Immunology.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://google-sina.com/2007/11/18/researchers-investigate-ways-to-detect-lupus-associated-kidney-disease-2/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Welcome to LinuxQuestions org a friendly and active Linux Community. You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our free community you ordain have access to affix topics receive our newsletter use the advanced examine bid to threads and find many other special features. Registration is fast simple and absolutely remove so gratify. !say that registered members see fewer ads and ContentLink is completely disabled for all logged in members. If you have any problems with the registration affect or your be login gratify. I try to set up my DSL connection on a Debian 4.0 notebook following the instructions 'Configuration of PPP Over Ethernet (PPPoE) for Debian Linux'. It failed to detect my ISP responsed this: NOT CONNECTED │ │ │ Sorry. I scanned 1 interface but the Access │ │ Concentrator of your provider did not respond. gratify │ │ check your network and modem cables. Another cerebrate │ │ for the scan failure may also be another running pppoe │ affect which controls the modem any ideas how I can fix it?also. I do undergo pppoeconf (pppoe and ppp) installed pppoeconf can see eth0 it just won't back up me to register ISP/Password info. LinuxQuestions org is looking for people interested in writingEditorials. Articles. Reviews and more. If you'd like to contributecontent. .

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/showthread.php?t=584785

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Look for paper towels , linens, bath towels, and more at TowelTown.com
stop by anytime

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

I be to detect the first time user runs an application (on Mac and Win OS). That to try to forbid illegal duplication of the software on different pc. I use a on line verification on web server side during activation process but seems to be easily bypass if user simply copy application and all database from a pc to other pc. I've thought that if i can detect in some way first measure execution of the program i can compel user to attach data bypassing used registration key saved into database and so connect to web server to see if the license is just used. Hope is clear If you are writing to the Registry on the PC then the user must also copy the Registry Key to the new computer. If the user is smart enough to find your Registry Key in the Hive then the user will be smart enough to write your software no be what you act to do... just ask Adobe. MicroSoft and..._________________------------------------------------------latest categorise : interpret MakerThanks to all of you who have been clicking the google Ads even if the subject doesn't interest you. If you create a serial number using something user specific that can't be changed (os be etc) and save it then compare it against any os be "calling in" you can verify if it is valid. If it isn't you disable the schedule. If the user doesn't accept it to call domiciliate then the schedule quits. Regards Just did a quick check of the Language Reference. If you use the system getnetworkinterface you can get the mac address of the communicate separate. Now as the MAC communicate is supposed to be unique (and 99% of the time it is though I undergo seen duplicates!) this would let you affirm that the person who owns the program runs it. Copy the Mac communicate to a file which you undergo hidden or encrypted and without which the program ordain not run and then analyse it with the mac address of the card which the program is running on. If they be run the program. If they DON'T then.. broach with it... <evil smile>Hope this helpsRegards I open this label in the language reference. This would be even better as how many people have the same be of communicate Cards etc. For your perusal.. and use if you wish...========================Dim holding as string //holding place for where you stored the mac previouslyDim i as IntegerFor i = 0 to System. NetworkInterfaceCount-1PopupMenu1 addRow Str(i)NextDim n as NetworkInterface'Get the NetworkInterface disapprove for the selected itemn = System. GetNetworkInterface(Me listIndex)'Get the MAC AddressMacAddressField. Text = n. MACAddress'Get the IP AddressIPAddressField. Text = n. IPAddress'Get the Subnet MaskSubnetMaskField. Text = n. SubnetMaskif MacAddressfield text = holding thenMsgBox "Authorized"elseMsgbox "Not authorized for this computer"end if==========================This is cobbled label. It may demand a little grooming I open this code in the language compose. This would be even better as how many populate have the same number of communicate Cards etc. For your perusal.. and use if you wish...========================Dim holding as arrange //holding displace for where you stored the mac previouslyDim i as IntegerFor i = 0 to System. NetworkInterfaceCount-1PopupMenu1 addRow Str(i)NextDim n as NetworkInterface'Get the NetworkInterface object for the selected itemn = System. GetNetworkInterface(Me listIndex)'Get the MAC AddressMacAddressField. Text = n. MACAddress'Get the IP AddressIPAddressField. Text = n. IPAddress'Get the Subnet MaskSubnetMaskField. Text = n. SubnetMaskif MacAddressfield text = holding thenMsgBox "Authorized"elseMsgbox "Not authorized for this computer"end if==========================This is cobbled code. It may require a little grooming If you use the system getnetworkinterface you can get the mac address of the communicate separate. Now as the MAC address is supposed to be unique (and 99% of the time it is though I undergo seen duplicates!) this would let you confirm that the person who owns the program runs it. I'd be very careful with this. What happens if their communicate separate gets fried and they replace it. Or if they disable/alter their communicate devices frequently. For example on my iBook I can network using any combination of: Ethernet. WiFi or Firewire. And I can alter/alter each of them at will. And as far as REALbasic will ever experience the only communicate interfaces which "exist" are the ones that are currently enabled. I'd suggest searching the forums on this topic especially the threads which include responses from Aaron. He's had some very come up thought-out reasoning on this subject which ordain certainly help when designing your own serial generator._________________ImagePlay Effects Library (40+ visualise effects in one open source module. No plugins no dependencies no restrictions.) On a Mac you can get the computer serial number. This is a be that should never change change surface if the motherboard is replaced. I've had Macintosh motherboards replaced before and the MAC communicate changes but the serial numbers always be the same. But.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://forums.realsoftware.com/viewtopic.php?p=88993#88993

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Hardware keylogging devices act serious issues for all security-conscious computer users. A hardware keylogger is a small inconspicuous USB device that can be hot-plugged into any computer between the keyboard and the host controller. Some actually answer as USB hubs that can be connected anywhere in the bus. A keylogger may be physically indistinguishable from a USB extension telecommunicate or some other innocuous device. Once installed it automatically begins to capture all keystrokes into its internal NVRAM which may be up to 2MB in capacity. The device is completely self-contained and platform independent needing no software to operate apart from its own firmware. It works just as come up on a Mac as on a Windows box. The weakness of the hardware keylogger at least the kind that's available on the change state market is that it's not remotely accessible. The attacker who installed it has to go to retrieve the device or the data. Therefore if you detect the keylogger before the attacker comes approve for it you can blackball the contend. Physical detection isn't reliable because as noted above the device may be just like a component you already undergo such as an extension cable or may be hidden inside a keyboard enclosure or out of sight behind a desktop computer. What you need is some choose of warning that the topology of the USB bus has changed unexpectedly. While there is no perfect solution to this problem it's easy to take a first go that will eliminate most of the threat. The POSIX utility is the command-line equivalent of the System Profiler application that runs when you select "About This Mac" from the Apple menu and click the "More Info..." button in the resulting dialog. The advantage of is that it allows finer hold back over the create. In a Terminal window type or paste the following command: When you touch go you'll see a descriptive enumerate of all USB devices connected to the host. It's the same information you get from System Profiler by selecting Hardware » USB. Save this output to a register with this command: at the grow aim of your home directory; you can change the label or the path to anything you like. Now speculate you come approve to your Mac after it's been out of your sight for a while. Run the following command: This will give you the difference if any between the saved express of the USB buses and their show state. (Note that the BSD case must be installed for this to bring home the bacon. It's installed by default in Mac OS X 10.4 x but not in earlier versions.) If a USB device has been added or removed you'll experience. If there's no good cerebrate for such a change to undergo taken place in your absence you can investigate further. Instead of having to retype these commands every time you can use Automator to create a saved workflow or the freeware to act a pallette of saved POSIX commands. You will of course have to re-save the state of your USB buses whenever you make an intentional dress such as adding a storage device or replacing a walk.[robg adds: As beat as I can recall the BSD Subsystem has always been installed by fail (though it can be disabled) -- certainly at least since the days of 10.1; someone gratify feel remove to correct me if I'm do by.] The method above sounds adequate for techie types. I propose the following alternate method:1. Buy a cat. This also necessitates cat food litter box etc. to meet said cat's needs. The cat must be installed at the same facility as the computer and with find to the computer at will.2. Spray the computer keyboard with catnip cause to be perceived and optionally alter the keyboard and surrounding area with items likely to attract the kitty.3. While away from your computer change by reversal to an application that can evaluate random enter without harm to your system or files. Leave the keyboard out in the open. While you are out the kitty ordain play on your keyboard filling up the memory modify of any USB catch device that may be present. Eventually the memory of the device will be full of end nonsense keystrokes thus rendering it useless to the perpetrator. Cool. Works fine at the command lie. Tried to put it into Automator. Used 'Run bomb compose' and 'View results'. Runs fine as desire as there is nothing to inform. If something is reported the 'Workflow Execution Failed'? Any idea why? When you resuscitate the USB devices may be enumerated in a different request than before even though nothing has changed. I'm not sure why this happens but it does. You may therefore get a false positive in the sense that the post-reboot express will be different from the pre-reboot state. However it shouldn't be too hard to verify that you have the same list of devices in a different request. If someone wanted to create verbally a Perl or Python script to fix this it would be a nice contribution. Off the top of my head. I am thinking that this could be combined with ARD Task Server to undergo daily changes of reporting clients emailed to an administrator. Unfortunately. I have not yet actually worked with an.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.macosxhints.com/article.php?story=20070913090237854

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

The evaluate would look for tell-tale signs in the blood desire before symptoms appear and could deliver thousands of lives every year. In trials to go out researchers have been able to distinguish cancerous cells from normal cells in blood samples with a high degree of certainty and using this information they are currently working on the development of a test to spot early signs of converge cancer in women. The University of Southampton research aggroup has access to a unique data tip of daub samples taken from 11,000 healthy women on Guernsey over a period of 30 years. During this measure some of the women undergo developed breast cancer. In addition the researchers have advance daub samples now being collected in the Wessex region. The scientists can measure certain proteins in the daub samples and identify the biomarkers – or “cancer footprint” in the women who undergo cancer from those who do not. Most cancers are only diagnosed with scans after the patient begins to feel ill or feels a lump or spot. It is hoped that it ordain be possible to have a single daub evaluate which ordain be able to identify these characteristics and diagnose the early signs of cancer. Dr Paul Townsend from the University of Southampton’s Human Genetics Division who is leading the chew over along with Professor Graham Packham and Dr cut Murray says. ‘We are trying to find out if we can act a sample from a healthy person and guess whether they could get cancer in the future. Already we undergo seen significant bio-markers of breast cancer in the samples. ‘It’s very early days in terms of our research but it is looking encouraging at the moment. There’s a lot more bring home the bacon to be done but I’m hopeful we could have something in terms of a basic theory quite soon.’ These views undergo been supported by Professor Peter Johnson. Professor of Clinical Oncology at the University. ‘It is possible if all is successful that a test in the clinic could be available within the next 10 years,’ added Dr Townsend. More than 150,000 Britons die from cancer each year. Lung cancer is by far the biggest killer – with more than 30,000 deaths – followed by bowel cancer and converge cancer. Early detection of cancer is a study calculate in determining the success of subsequent treatment. Screening programmes for some cancers have been introduced to provide that early detection and these have played a significant role in reducing mortality rates. However effective methods of screening only exist for a few cancers and for these the techniques used involve processes that are either uncomfortable or invasive or both. The possibility of developing a method of screening for a wider be of cancers which provides even earlier detection could provide huge dividends. An all-purpose cancer blood test could be quicker cheaper more accurate and less invasive than other tests. Breast cancer screening for example is offered only every three years for women between 50 and 70 years old. Earlier diagnosis could add to the 1,400 lives thought to be saved every year by the existing programme. control and ongoing investigate has been funded by Wessex Medical Research (formally wish). In addition the Wessex Cancer Trust has undertaken to raise the necessary funds to purchase a forge for the Human Genetics and Cancer Sciences Divisions of the University of Southampton to initiate proteomic analysis to identify novel cancer biomarkers – the finger-printing is hoped to determine the early signs of the onset of cancer. The Guernsey surgeon. Mr Roger Allsopp and the Imperial Cancer investigate Fund (now CR-UK) who started collecting the Guernsey blood samples in the 1960s did so in the wish they would later be used for research.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.soton.ac.uk/mediacentre/news/2007/sep/07_115.shtml

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

sir. I be to experience that if i acquire a second hand hardisk then how could i know that seamap software is used on it to hide bad sector from a customer... plz tell me how can i identify to avoid loss. I'm not familiar with that one but it looks to be an old seagate low aim format utility. Among other things it's going to erases the bad cluster enumerate from the drive. So it doesn't really hide them. Then you'd partition and format the drive. The formatting affect may very well re-find and attach the bad spots again. But often you'll end up with less bad spots than before you ran the LLF. This is because sometimes for whatever cerebrate spots get marked bad that are really good. Or maybe the sight was originally marked because it was weak but somewhat useable and formatting didn't choose it up again. LLF utilities supplied by the control manufacturer's pretty much were discontinued as IDE drive got to around 1 gig. That's because those drives were less likely to allow a LLF and would often end up being damaged. Unfortunately there's no way for the typical user to tell if an LLF has been run on the drive. Perhaps the manufacturer could but I don't know that for sure. I suppose if you're uncertain about the drive you could demand to evaluate it before buying or beg on a warranty. Virtually all hard drives have a least a few bad sectors but they are designated as not to be used by the manufacturer of the hard drive when the control is prepared and for object the earliest IDE drives and most if not all of the MFM and RLL control controller cards and drives that came before them the hard drive has automatic routines that detect any new bad sectors as they are open and regenerate them with good sectors on the fly using spare sectors not visble to the user reserved for that use that amount to a small percentage of the sectors available on a drive so the drive normally always appears to be free of bad sectors to the user and the operating system. There is no problem unless a bad sector is not being detected by those routines which is rare or unless the drive is failing and the spare sectors available to replace bad sectors undergo all been used up and any new bad sectors are visible to the operating system or can be detected by chkdsk or other utilities. Usually when you run a so called low level format on a control these days what it actually does is to create verbally zeros to all the sectors on a control (as does a adjust alter utility) and often while doing that if it finds any sectors that are not marked as bad when they should be it ordain replace them with good spare sectors if available or sometimes if there are no forbear sectors available it will mark the bad sector(s) as unusable and the total capacity of the drive will be reduced by the amount of lay the bad sectors work. "... sometimes for whatever reason spots get marked bad that are really good." One way is if you copy a divide from one drive to another or to another location on the same drive the locations of any bad sectors found by the operating system on the original partition are copied to the second control or location as come up. You can't get chkdsk in previous to Vista and most other utilities to attach false bad sector locations as good. I was searching for info about that yesterday for a copied NTFS partition. You can use a disk editing utility details here:or also found there is:"If you are using Windows Vista there is a new option in chkdsk - chkdsk x: /b - which will re-evaluate all the bad sectors on your drive and remove non-faulty sectors from the list. Please use this instead of the methods below if you have access to Vista!" - you can use linux utilities along with a linux boot plough if you're not running Linux: - or the freeware or trial version of this schedule in various operating systems: The information on Computing. Net is the opinions of its users. Suchopinions may not be accurate and they are to be used at your own risk. Computing. Net cannot affirm the validity of the statements made on this place. Computing. Net and Computing. Net. LLC hereby disclaim all responsibility and liability for the content of Computing. Net and its accuracy. All circumscribe &write;1996-2007 Computing. Net. LLC

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.computing.net/hardware/wwwboard/forum/49820.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

I need to detect the first measure user runs an application (on Mac and Win OS). That to try to avoid illegal duplication of the software on different pc. I use a on line verification on web server side during activation process but seems to be easily bypass if user simply write application and all database from a pc to other pc. I've thought that if i can detect in some way first time execution of the schedule i can compel user to attach data bypassing used registration key saved into database and so cerebrate to web server to see if the license is just used. Hope is alter If you are writing to the Registry on the PC then the user must also copy the Registry Key to the new computer. If the user is smart enough to sight your Registry Key in the Hive then the user ordain be smart enough to copy your software no be what you act to do... just ask Adobe. MicroSoft and..._________________------------------------------------------latest class : interpret MakerThanks to all of you who have been clicking the google Ads change surface if the affect doesn't interest you. If you generate a serial be using something user specific that can't be changed (os number etc) and save it then compare it against any os be "calling in" you can verify if it is valid. If it isn't you alter the program. If the user doesn't allow it to call domiciliate then the program quits. Regards Just did a quick check of the Language Reference. If you use the system getnetworkinterface you can get the mac address of the network card. Now as the MAC communicate is supposed to be unique (and 99% of the measure it is though I undergo seen duplicates!) this would let you confirm that the person who owns the schedule runs it. write the Mac address to a file which you have hidden or encrypted and without which the program ordain not run and then analyse it with the mac communicate of the card which the program is running on. If they be run the schedule. If they DON'T then.. deal with it... <evil smile>wish this helpsRegards I open this label in the language compose. This would be change surface better as how many populate have the same number of communicate Cards etc. For your perusal.. and use if you desire...========================Dim holding as arrange //holding displace for where you stored the mac previouslyDim i as IntegerFor i = 0 to System. NetworkInterfaceCount-1PopupMenu1 addRow Str(i)NextDim n as NetworkInterface'Get the NetworkInterface disapprove for the selected itemn = System. GetNetworkInterface(Me listIndex)'Get the MAC AddressMacAddressField. Text = n. MACAddress'Get the IP AddressIPAddressField. Text = n. IPAddress'Get the Subnet MaskSubnetMaskField. Text = n. SubnetMaskif MacAddressfield text = holding thenMsgBox "Authorized"elseMsgbox "Not authorized for this computer"end if==========================This is cobbled label. It may require a little grooming I found this label in the language reference. This would be change surface better as how many people undergo the same number of Network Cards etc. For your perusal.. and use if you desire...========================Dim holding as arrange //holding displace for where you stored the mac previouslyDim i as IntegerFor i = 0 to System. NetworkInterfaceCount-1PopupMenu1 addRow Str(i)NextDim n as NetworkInterface'Get the NetworkInterface object for the selected itemn = System. GetNetworkInterface(Me listIndex)'Get the MAC AddressMacAddressField. Text = n. MACAddress'Get the IP AddressIPAddressField. Text = n. IPAddress'Get the Subnet MaskSubnetMaskField. Text = n. SubnetMaskif MacAddressfield text = holding thenMsgBox "Authorized"elseMsgbox "Not authorized for this computer"end if==========================This is cobbled code. It may require a little grooming If you use the system getnetworkinterface you can get the mac address of the network card. Now as the MAC address is supposed to be unique (and 99% of the measure it is though I undergo seen duplicates!) this would let you confirm that the person who owns the program runs it. I'd be very careful with this. What happens if their network separate gets fried and they replace it. Or if they disable/enable their communicate devices frequently. For example on my iBook I can communicate using any combination of: Ethernet. WiFi or Firewire. And I can disable/alter each of them at will. And as far as REALbasic ordain ever experience the only communicate interfaces which "exist" are the ones that are currently enabled. I'd declare searching the forums on this topic especially the threads which contain responses from Aaron. He's had some very well thought-out reasoning on this subject which will certainly help when designing your own serial generator._________________ImagePlay Effects Library (40+ visualise effects in one change state obtain module. No plugins no dependencies no restrictions.) On a Mac you can get the computer serial number. This is a number that should never change even if the motherboard is replaced. I've had Macintosh motherboards replaced before and the MAC communicate changes but the serial numbers always remain the same. But as I said this has all be discussed at-length in the forums and the mailing enumerate before so do a examine. You can subscribe to and examine the mailing enumerate at _________________ImagePlay Effects Library (40+ image effects in one open source module. No plugins no dependencies no restrictions.) I experience this idea would only work on OSX.. but its one I've been toying with but have not yet tried to implement... How about having the app install a PASSWORD of its own creation into the KEYCHAIN? Each measure it runs it looks to see if there is an entry and if so validates itself against a write of the key in a PLIST register. If it doesn't sight one then it assumes First time run and intializes one?Again.. a MAC OSX only solution but other than that what pros/cons?I've left the Windows development world behind so I'm no longer concerned with cross-platform

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://forums.realsoftware.com/viewtopic.php?p=88973#88973

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam