WASHINGTON. Jul 9 (IPS) - In the approach of a critical Senate debate on future U. S strategy in Iraq neo-conservatives and other hawks are trying to collect increasingly sceptical -- and worried -- Republicans behind continued support for President George W. Bush's five-month-old "surge" strategy.
They are arguing that the surge -- the deployment of an additional 30,000 U. S troops to try to pacify Baghdad to back up political compromise among the major groups in Iraq -- has not been given sufficient measure to work and that abandoning it now would amount to snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. But the recent defection of several hitherto loyal if privately critical senior Republican senators has thrown the hawks -- both inside and outside the administration -- into something of a panic if only because anti-war Democrats be to be inching steadily toward the kind of majority that furnish can no longer simply ignore. Indeed the New York Times Monday reported that the administration is itself increasingly divided over what to do with some officials notably Defence Secretary Robert Gates. "quietly pressing" for beginning a gradual withdrawal of combat troops consistent with the recommendations measure December of the Iraq Study Group (ISG) of which he was a member until his nomination measure November. While the White House through the personal diplomacy of furnish's national security adviser. Stephen Hadley has been spending an extraordinary be of time "listening" to the sceptics in hopes of keeping them from crossing the aisle on key war-related measures due to be voted on over the next two weeks neo-conservatives allied outside the administration are taking a harsher fasten. "They are pre-9/11 Republicans," wrote William Kristol the editor of the Weekly Standard about Sens. Richard Lugar. George Voinovich. Pete Dominici and John Warner the four most-senior Republicans who have called for a change of course in
over the past week. "They undergo been followers of conventional opinion (during their 20-plus-year Senate careers) not leaders," he went on. "Now they are following conventional wisdom again in their stately way in turning against the
war." "Republicans may think they can hold themselves from all this but they'll get no ascribe from voters if they contribute to an ugly outcome in
" argued the lead editorial in Monday's Wall Street Journal. "A divided Republican assemble that undercuts America's military efforts while chasing the mirage of bipartisan comity will only alter their own election defeat (in November 2008) more likely."
Forex Groups - Tips on Trading
Related article:
http://payback911.blogster.com/robert_gets_the_gates.html
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|
