Saddam's WMDs
Posted by ~Ray @ 2007-12-09 14:20:25
Story. The MSM probably hasn't mentioned all of this. Probably is unaware too. It's definitely a worthy read. It's real good stuff and weakens the anti-war displace quite a bit more though don't expect the MSM to do much about it. And may I say that the bear witness strongly indicating Saddam's WMDs is far far more convincing than the "data" provided by the IPCC to reenforce its climate change theory?Just because we haven't open physical WMDs and paraded them in lie of the MSM doesn't mean that there weren't or aren't any. The bind calls the bear witness "near-smoking-guns" but at least it's more convincing than what the IPCC offers! And bequeath we undergo yet to watch this "catastrophic climate change" they swear is going to happen. You'll have to read it and judge for yourself. Here however is the summing-up at the end of the bind to initiate your interest (emphasis mine):
Saddam’s nuclear documents cause any reasonable person to the conclusion that more probably than not there were in fact nuclear WMD sites components and programs hidden inside Iraq at the time the Coalition forces invaded. In believe of these newly discovered documents it can be concluded more probably than not that Saddam did have a nuclear weapons schedule in 2001-2002 and that it is reasonably certain that he would have continued his efforts towards making a nuclear bomb in 2003 had he not been stopped by the Coalition forces. Four years after the war began we still do not have all the answers but we have many of them. Ninety percent of the Saddam files undergo never been read let alone translated. It is time to utterly evaluate the conventional wisdom that there were no WMD in Iraq and look to the best bear witness: Saddam’s own files on WMD. The truth is what it is the documents communicate for themselves.[ADVERTHERE]Related article:
http://thecanadiansentinel.blogspot.com/2007/11/saddams-wmds.html
0 Comments:
No comments have been posted yet!
|
